If f (n) = o (g (n)) then 2 ^ (f (n)) = o (2 ^ (g (n)))?
At least if g (n) converges to positive infinity for n to positive infinity (if g (n) is not, then it is easy to find counterexamples).
Proof sketch:
Prerequsites: g (n) converges to positive infinity for n to positive infinity.
f (n) in o (g (n)) means:
for every eps > 0 exists a n0 so that for all n > n0 abs(f(n)) < abs(g(n)*eps).
Formulate it like this:
2^abs(f(n)) < 2^abs(g(n)*eps) = (2^eps)^g(n) (for n > n0).
For eps <1:
(2^eps)^n is in o(2^n) (as 2^eps < 2)
it follows that for any eps2> 0 there exists n1, so for all n> n1
(2^eps)^n < eps2*(2^n).
Selection eps2 = eps vields:
(2^eps)^n < eps*(2^n) for all n > n1 (n1 is dependent on eps)
Since g (n) → pos. inf. for n → pos. inf. there is n2 so that
g(n) > n1 for all n > n2
After that there is
(2^eps)^g(n) < eps*2^g(n) for all n > n2.
So, for every 0 <eps <1, there is n3> = max (n0, n2), so
2^abs(f(n)) < 2^abs(g(n)*eps) = (2^eps)^g(n) < eps*2^g(n) for all n > n3.
For each eps3> 1 also:
2^abs(f(n)) < eps*2^g(n) < eps3*2^g(n)
So, for every ep> 0 there is n3, so
2^abs(f(n)) < eps*2^g(n) for all n > n3
Becase 2 ^ f (n) 2 ^ abs (f (n)) for all n and 2 ^ x> 0 for all real x, then
abs(2^f(n)) < abs(eps*2^g(n)) for all n > n3
qed
If something is unclear or incorrect, please comment.
EDIT: Some thoughts on other g (n):
The subsequence g (n) is bounded, i.e. there is some x, so there is no n0 with abs (g (n))> = x for all n> n0:
o (g (n)) consists only of functions that are constant 0 after some n or converge to 0. Then 2 ^ g (n) also has a bounded subsequence, but 2 ^ f (n) is constant 1 after some point.
There is no n0, so g (n)> 0 for all n> n0:
2 ^ g (n) 1 if g (n) 0, so g (n) has a bounded subsequence meaning o (2 ^ g (n)) consists only of functions that are constant 0 after some n or converge to 0 ...
source to share
Here's the answer. The result depends on the convergence properties of g (n).
Consider the associated limit first:
lim(x->inf) log_2 ((2^(f(n))) / (2^(g(n))))
=
lim(x->inf) ( log_2(2^(f(n))) - log_2(2^(g(n))) )
=
lim(x->inf) ( f(n) - g(n) ) = lim(x->inf) ( g(n) * f(n) / g(n) - g(n) )
=
lim(x->inf) ( -g(n) ) = - lim(x->inf) g(n)
... Now, to get this in the form of the original question in your post, IF it is mathematically correct to switch the limit and log (which I think it is), then we would have:
lim(x->inf) log_2 ((2^(f(n))) / (2^(g(n))))
=
log_2 lim(x->inf) ((2^(f(n))) / (2^(g(n)))).
Now let's move on to answering the question. If the value it is true that
2^(f(n)) = o(2^(g(n))),
then in the limit the right-hand side becomes
log_2 (0) = - inf
... so in this scenario it should be true that
lim(x->inf) g(n) = inf
This result seems to make sense. Let's consider f(x) = exp(-x) and g(x) = 1 - exp(-x)
. It is clear that in this example f(x) = o(g(x))
. However 2^(f(x)) is not o(2^(g(x)))
, because
lim(x->inf) (2^exp(-x)) / (2^(1-exp(-x))) = 1/2.
But under the condition f(x) = exp(x), g(x) = exp(2x)
, where also f(x) = o(g(x))
and where lim(x->inf) g(x) = inf
, satisfying the above condition, we have
lim(x->inf) (2^exp(x)) / (2^exp(2x))
=
lim(x->inf) 1 / 2^(exp(x)*(exp(x) - 1)) = 0
so 2^(f(x)) = o(2^(g(x)))
.
source to share
Simple proof with example,
If f (n) = O (g (n)) then 2 ^ (f (n)) is not equal to O (2 ^ g (n)))
Let f (n) = 2log n and g (n) = log n
(Suppose log is to base 2)
We know 2log n <= c (log n) so f (n) = O (g (n))
2 ^ (f (n)) = 2 ^ log n ^ 2 = n ^ 2
2 ^ (g (n)) = 2 ^ log n = n
We know
n ^ 2 is not O (n)
Hence 2 ^ (f (n)) is not equal to O (2 ^ g (n)))
source to share