Feature branch dependencies with Gitflow

We are using Gitflow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ as our way of working and developers keep saying they always face the problem that the next function builds on the latter (adding new functions), so I told them that they can detach the previous function, work locally and when the previous function is approved (pull request) then they can rebuild based on the dev branch, so it looks nice in history, but they don't like it, so they offer an integration branch so that all the work is based on that and then they merge back the integration and then issue a pull request to the development branches so that this way they always work on the latest code.

What do you undertake?

Yes, I know that dependent work is not good, but I don't think there is a way to get around this, I mean you create a function on previous work, and if that work is not good, you cannot do it.

It's also possible that our features are too big, but I don't think so, we use 3-4 days for each developer per branch before we usually issue a pull request.

donnib

+3
git workflow git-flow


source to share


No one has answered this question yet

Check out similar questions:

15981
How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
7919
How do I rename my local Git branch?
6334
How do I checkout a remote Git branch?
4540
Move the latest commit (s) to a new branch using Git
4105
How do I push my new local branch to a remote Git repository and track it?
3946
How do I clone all remote branches in Git?
3398
Make an existing Git tracking branch a remote branch?
3388
Reset branch of local repository must be as HEAD remote repository
2886
Remove a commit from a branch in Git
879
Git workflow and rebase vs merge questions



All Articles
Loading...
X
Show
Funny
Dev
Pics