Menu and other submenus when pressed

I am trying to create menus and submenus in angular. What I want to do is to have two arrays of Menu objects

menu = [{name: 'Name1', link: '/link1'}, {name: 'Name2', link: '/link2'}]
submenu = [[{name: 'SubName1', link: '/Sublink1'}, {name: 'SubName1', link: '/sublink1'}],
[[{name: 'SubName2', link: '/Sublink2'}, {name: 'SubName2', link: '/sublink2'}]]

      

So when I click Name1

, the first array will be selected SubMenu

, and by pressing Name2

the second array is selected. How can I create two Directives for the main menu and the second one for the second and be able to communicate between them on click. I tried to build this in the controller, I was able to select the submenu with $index

, but the submenu cannot be moved as I like because it has to be under the controller.

I finally managed to solve my problem, here is the solution: http://jsfiddle.net/4kjjyL4s/4/

How can I improve my solution?

+3


source to share


4 answers


Don't reinvent the wheel :) The UI router is a prepackaged solution that handles nested routing for you.



If you have a menu of items and you want to display a different menu of items when one of the items is selected, the UI router does just that. https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router

+4


source


It is impossible to give an exact answer because the information is missing, but for example if you use directives with different menu items elsewhere in your application, I would recommend passing the menu array from the controller (ng -controller, not directive controller) through the scope.

Also, if you're looking for a standard way for directives to communicate directly (in your case, the link between a menu and a submenu directive to notify an item selection change), use a directive controller. Here's a good tutorial.



https://thinkster.io/egghead/directive-to-directive-communication/

0


source


For communication between controllers or directives, you must use services .

From the angular manual ( https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/services ):

Angular services are replaceable objects that are chained together using Dependency Injection (DI). You can use services to organize and share code in your application.

I checked the code you posted on the jsfiddle ( http://jsfiddle.net/4kjjyL4s/4/ ) and I tried to make the most of it. Below are my changes to the JavaScript file (please read the comments in the code).

var app = angular.module("app",[]);

app.controller('main', function(){});
// The service will be responsible for the shared objects and logic
app.service('MenuService', function () {
  var list = [
    {
      name: "Menu1", link: "#menu1", 
      submenu: [ 
        { name: "Menu1Sub1", link: "#submenu1" },
        { name: "Menu1Sub2", link: "#submenu2" }
      ]
    },
    {
      name: "Menu2", link: "#menu2",
      submenu: [
        { name: "Menu2Sub1", link: "#submenu1" }, 
        { name: "Menu2Sub2", link: "#submenu2" }
      ]
    }
  ];

  var selected = [];

  // methods and attributes published under the **this** 
  // keyword will be publicly available
  this.getMenu = function () {
    return list;
  };

  this.getSubmenu = function () {
    return selected;
  };

  this.select = function ( menuItem ) {
    // this does the *trick*!
    // if we use the assignment operator here,  we would replace the 
    // reference returned in the getSubmenu() method, so as the original 
    // reference did not change, angular dirty checking would not detect it.
    // using angular.copy() method, we are copying the contents of the
    // selected submenu over the same reference returned by getSubmenu()
    angular.copy( menuItem.submenu, selected );
  };
});

// No $rootScope injection results in better re-usability. When you were
// relying in $rootScope sharing, both directives should live in the 
// $rootScope, so if you add them inside a ng-controller created scope
// they would not work anymore
app.directive("menu", function() {
  return {
    restrict: "E",

    // no need to isolate scope here, *scope:true* creates a new scope
    // which inherits from the current scope
    scope: true,

    // with controllerAs (introduced in angular 1.2), you can skip 
    // polluting the scope injection.
    controllerAs: "ctrl",
    controller: function( MenuService ) {
      this.list = MenuService.getMenu();
      this.changeSub = function ( menuItem ) { MenuService.select( menuItem ); };
    },
    template: "<div ng-repeat='menu in ctrl.list'><button ng-click='ctrl.changeSub(menu)'>{{menu.name}}</button></div>"
  };
});

app.directive("submenu", function() {
  return {
    restrict: "E",
    scope: true,
    controllerAs: "ctrl",
    controller: function( MenuService ) {
      this.sublist = MenuService.getSubmenu();
    },
    template: "<span ng-repeat='menu in ctrl.sublist'>{{menu.name}} | </span>aa"
  };
});

      

And here is an updated HTML file to show that both directives are now not directly inserted into $rootScope

<div ng-app="app">
    <div ng-controller="main">
        <menu></menu>
        <h1>Hello World!</h1>
        <div class="main-content">
            <submenu></submenu>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

      

Hope it helps!

0


source


Try this code:

function MyCtrl ($scope) {
        $scope.subMenu = [];    // default is false

    $scope.toggleSubMenu = function (index) {
        $scope.subMenu[index] = !$scope.subMenu[index];
    };
}

      

Html

<ul>
    <li ng-class="{active: subMenu[0]}"> <a href="#hello" ng-click="toggleSubMenu(0)">Name1</a>
        <ul>
            <li>test</li>
            <li>test</li>
            <li>test</li>
        </ul>
    </li>
    <li ng-class="{active: subMenu[1]}"> <a href="#foo" ng-click="toggleSubMenu(1)">Name2</a>
        <ul>
            <li>bar</li>
            <li>bar</li>
            <li>bar</li>
        </ul>
    </li>

</ul>

      

Also check this

0


source







All Articles