Local variable constraint values

I am currently working on a scheduling problem using a library: - use_module (library (clpq)). My problem is getting a complete solution to my problem.

schedule(BestSchedule, BestTotTime) :-          %BestSchedule of format [test(task,startTime,Duration Task, Core]
    (  findall(T,task(T),Tasks),
       findall(C,core(C),Cores),
       init_time,                               %Retract all facts of bestsofar(_,_)
       const_time(Tasks,Schedule,Cores,TotTime),%Here probably goes something wrong
       assign_processor(Schedule,Cores, TotTime),
       minimize(TotTime),
       update_time(Schedule, TotTime),  
       fail
    ;  bestsofar(BestSchedule,BestTotTime)
    ).

assign_processor([], _, _).  
assign_processor([task(T,S,D,C)|Rest], Cores, TotTime) :-
    assign_processor(Rest,Cores,TotTime),
    core(C),                            %Pick a core
    process_cost(T,C,D),                %Core/Task known, setting Duration (D)
    const_resource(task(T,S,D,C),Rest), %Setting extra constraints on chosen core 
    bestsofar(_,CurrentBestTime),       %Get current best time from fact bestsofar
    {TotTime < CurrentBestTime}.        %Set new constraint based on currentBestTime


const_resource(_,[]).
const_resource(Task,[Task2|Rest]) :- 
    no_data(Task,Task2),
    no_conflict(Task,Task2),            %No overlap on same processor
    const_resource(Task, Rest).         

no_conflict(task(_,S,D,C),task(_,S2,D2,C2)) :-
    C \== C2,!;                         %Tasks not on same processor
    { S+D =< S2;                        %Set no overlapping start/end times
     S2+D2 =< S }.  

no_data(task(T,S,D,C), task(T2,S2,D2,C2)) :-
         %depends_on(T,T2,_) = T2 needs to be finished before T can start
         %channel(C,C2,L,_) = Data transfer between cores generated latency L
         %Set no overlap including the latency if tasks are dependent
    depends_on(T,T2,_),channel(C,C2,L,_),!, { S2 + D2  =< S - L };
    depends_on(T2,T,_),!,channel(C2,C,L,_),!, { S + D   =< S2 - L};
    true.

init_time :-
    retract(bestsofar(_,_)), fail
    ;
    assert(bestsofar(foobar, 1000)).

update_time(Schedule,TotTime) :-
    retract(bestsofar(_,_)),!,
    assert(bestsofar(Schedule,TotTime)).

S = [task(t7, 100, 10, c1), task(t1, 0, 10, c1), task(t6, 75, 10, c1),
     task(t2, _G66, 10, c1), task(t4, 50, 10, c2), task(t3, 25, 10, c1),
     task(t5, 50, 10, c1)],
ET = 110.

      

        
        
        
      

    

This solution seems to be correct, but I don't have a specific task value (t2, _G66 , 10, c1) (task number, start time, duration, cpu core).

As far as I know, this is a local variable whose values ​​should be between 25 and 60 or 60 <_G66 <75, but I cannot find a way to print these values ​​in Prolog itself. I thought minimizing (TotTime) would force all variables to be minimized, which seems to happen with the rest.

Edit:

Added some more code to show where the problem should lie. No other mishaps are produced elsewhere. bestsofar/2

used to store the current best graphics solution and runtime. When we find a better, faster graph, replace it with update_time/2

. This search will always fail, so all possible solutions will be tested. After that we will reach bestsofar(BestSchedule,BestTotTime)

and return these values.

If I look at the debugger before returning the result. B=35-A

which supports my manual test 35<B<50

or 60<B<75

. There is no way to draw the conclusion on my own because I don't know how to interpret the meaning _

in these constraints.

[ task(t7,100,10,c1),
  task(t1,0,10,c1),
  task(t6,75,10,c1),
  task(t2,B,10,c1),
  task(t4,50,10,c2),
  task(t3,25,10,c1),
  task(t5,50,10,c1)
], % with constraints
    {}(_ = -55 - A ',' _ = -40 - A ',' _ = -25 + A ',' _ = -10 + A ',' _ = -30 - A ',' _ = -5 - A ',' A >= -5 ',' A =< 0 ',' _ = -55 - A ',' _ = -25 + A ',' _ = 65 + A ',' B = 35 - A)

      

        
        
        
      

    

Without, no_data/2

my code really works for examples where channel latency is not used. So I guess any problem should be with this piece of code.

Launch code if interested: http://pastebin.com/3PmRu7Aq