WsHttpsBinding Vs wsHttpBinding
I have come across wsHttpBinding a lot when writing code for WCF projects. However, I've never used the wsHttp s binding .
Question : does wsHttp s exist . Does the binding even exist in WCF or its custom binding? If it exists, then why would a developer use wsHttp s Binding and not wsHttpBinding?
source to share
WsHttpBinding also maintains interoperability. With this binding, the SOAP message is encrypted by default. It supports HTTP and HTTPS. In terms of encoding, it provides support for Text as well as MTOM encoding techniques. It supports WS- * standards such as WS-Addressing, WS-Security, and WS-ReliableMessaging. By default, trusted sessions are disabled, as this can result in negligible performance overhead. http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/431291/WCF-Services-Choosing-the-appropriate-WCF-binding
source to share