R - testing Quantstrat - back not working

I used the following code from Guy Yollin's lecture. The result I got was wrong. The result is displayed below the code.

library(blotter)
library(quantstrat)

currency("USD")
stock("SPY", currency = "USD", multiplier = 1)

initDate = "1997-12-31"
startDate = "1998-01-01"
endDate = "2014-06-30"
initEQ = 1e6

Sys.setenv(TZ = "UTC")

getSymbols('SPY', from = startDate, to = endDate, index.class = "POSIXct", adjust = T)

SPY = to.monthly(SPY, indexAt = "endof", drop.time = FALSE)
SPY$SMA10m <- SMA(Cl(SPY),10)

qs.strategy <- "qsFaber"

initPortf(qs.strategy, "SPY", initDate = initDate)
initAcct(qs.strategy, portfolios = qs.strategy, initDate = initDate, initEq = initEQ)
initOrders(portfolio = qs.strategy, initDate = initDate)

strategy(qs.strategy, store = TRUE)

strat <- getStrategy(qs.strategy)

add.indicator(
  strategy = qs.strategy,
  name = "SMA",
  arguments = list(
    x = quote(Cl(mktdata)), 
    n = 10),
  label = "SMA10"
)

add.signal(
  qs.strategy,
  name = "sigCrossover",
  arguments = list (
    columns = c("Close", "SMA10"),
    relationship = "gt"),
  label = "Cl.gt.SMA"
  )

add.signal (
  qs.strategy,
  name = "sigCrossover",
  arguments = list(
    columns = c("Close", "SMA10"),
    relationship = "lt"),
  label = "Cl.lt.SMA"
)

add.rule(
  qs.strategy,
  name = "ruleSignal",
  arguments = list(
    sicol = "Cl.gt.SMA",
    sigval = TRUE,
    orderqty = 900,
    ordertype = "market",
    orderside = "long"),
  type = "enter"
)

add.rule(
  qs.strategy,
  name = "ruleSignal",
  arguments = list(
    sicol = "Cl.lt.SMA",
    sigval = TRUE,
    orderqty = "all",
    ordertype = "market",
    orderside = "long"),
  type = "exit"
)

applyStrategy(strategy = qs.strategy, portfolios = qs.strategy)

getTxns(Portfolio = qs.strategy, "SPY")

      

getTxns (Portfolio = qs.strategy, "SPY")

Txn.Qty Txn.Price Txn.Fees Txn.Value Txn.Avg.Cost Net.Txn.Realized.PL 1997-12-31

 0         0        0         0            0                   0

      

Any feedback or responses would be appreciated! Thanks in advance!

+3


source to share


1 answer


Mark as 70. he should read sigcol not sicol.



+1


source







All Articles