A similar function for php str_replace in python?
I believe the answer is no.
I would list your search / replace strings in a list and repeat it:
edits = [(search0, replace0), (search1, replace1), (search2, replace2)] # etc.
for search, replace in edits:
s = s.replace(search, replace)
Even if python had the str_replace
-style function , I think I will still highlight find / replace strings as a list, so it really only takes one extra line of code.
Finally, it is a programming language. If it doesn't provide the function you want, you can always define it yourself.
source to share
Heh - you can use a one-line snapshot whose elegance is second only to its convenience: -P
(acts like PHP when the search is longer than the replacement, if I read it correctly in the PHP docs.):
**** Edit: This new version works for all substrings that need to be replaced. ****
>>> subject = "Coming up with these convoluted things can be very addictive."
>>> search = ['Coming', 'with', 'things', 'addictive.', ' up', ' these', 'convoluted ', ' very']
>>> replace = ['Making', 'Python', 'one-liners', 'fun!']
>>> reduce(lambda s, p: s.replace(p[0],p[1]),[subject]+zip(search, replace+['']*(len(search)-len(replace))))
'Making Python one-liners can be fun!'
source to share
Do it with regular expressions:
import re
def replace_from_list(replacements, str):
def escape_string_to_regex(str):
return re.sub(r"([\\.^$*+?{}[\]|\(\)])", r"\\\1", str)
def get_replacement(match):
return replacements[match.group(0)]
replacements = dict(replacements)
replace_from = [escape_string_to_regex(r) for r in replacements.keys()]
regex = "|".join(["(%s)" % r for r in replace_from])
repl = re.compile(regex)
return repl.sub(get_replacement, str)
# Simple replacement:
assert replace_from_list([("in1", "out1")], "in1") == "out1"
# Replacements are never themselves replaced, even if later search strings match
# earlier destination strings:
assert replace_from_list([("1", "2"), ("2", "3")], "123") == "233"
# These are plain strings, not regexps:
assert replace_from_list([("...", "out")], "abc ...") == "abc out"
Using regular expressions to do this speeds up searches. It will not substitute a replacement for a replacement for subsequent replacements that would normally be required.
source to share
Made a tiny recursive function for this
def str_replace(sbjct, srch, rplc):
if len(sbjct) == 0:
return ''
if len(srch) == 1:
return sbjct.replace(srch[0], rplc[0])
lst = sbjct.split(srch[0])
reslst = []
for s in lst:
reslst.append(str_replace(s, srch[1:], rplc[1:]))
return rplc[0].join(reslst);
source to share