Does anyone know of a Click structure?

I was recommended to choose a framework from Apache. But I can't find forums talking about tests, reviews, advantages, disadvantages, usefulness, ease of implementation, etc.

I've been asked to use it to design a website, but I'm completely in the dark about its strengths and weaknesses.

And his damn name doesn't help !! Click? Hello Apache! Call your next structure "just" for fun. I dare you.

So can anyone comment on his experience with Click?

+2


source to share


2 answers


What I personally like about the Click framework is that it is pretty close to HTML / HTTP and the Servlet API. There is no huge abstraction to familiarize yourself with. You have a page class, a form class ... If you need to persist state across calls, you put it in a session or pass it through a URL ... This makes it easier to use. It is also easy to control the generated HTML pages. This may seem like a very simple foundation, but simplicity is actually one of its greatest strengths.



Other frameworks (like Seam) are more suitable for building a very large web application with many reusable components and complex pages, but the learning curve is much steeper. So for me, Click works well for small to medium sites.

+7


source


This is an apache incubator project , but this does not mean that the project is unstable, but reflects its transition to the Apache project model.
Click the JSF equivalent version of Apache for Component-Based Web Infrastructure (other core Java Framework components are Tapestry and Wicket) Click Ohloh



There is an official official blog and some links on Wikipedia: Framework Comparison and Information Page

+2


source







All Articles