Calculation of 95% confidence interval for the sum of n iid exponential random variables

Let it actually be generalized to an a c

-versal interval. Let the general speed parameter a

. (Note that the mean of the exponential distribution with the velocity parameter a

is 1/a

.)

First find the cdf sums of n

such iid random variables. Use this to calculate the c

-confidence interval by sum. Note that the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the sum is n/a

, i.e. n

multiplies the average of one draw.

Background: This appears in a program I write to make estimates of time using random samples. If I take samples according to a Poisson process (i.e. the gaps between samples have an exponential distribution) and n

from them occur during action X, what is a good estimate for the duration of action X? I'm sure the answer is the answer to this question.

+1


source to share


3 answers


As John D. Cook hinted, the sum iid of exponential random variables has a gamma distribution.
Here the cdf of the sum of n exponential random variables with the velocity parameter a (expressed in Mathematica):

F[x_] := 1 - GammaRegularized[n, a*x];

      

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RegularizedGammaFunction.html

Reverse cdf:

Fi[p_] := InverseGammaRegularized[n, 1 - p]/a;

      



Then the c-confidence interval

ci[c_, a_, n_] := {Fi[a, n, (1-c)/2], Fi[a, n, c+(1-c)/2]}

      

Here's some code to empirically test the above:

(* Random draw from an exponential distribution given rate param. *)
getGap[a_] := -1/a*Log[RandomReal[]]

betw[x_, {a_, b_}] := Boole[a <= x <= b]

c = .95;
a = 1/.75;
n = 40;
ci0 = ci[c, a, n];
N@Mean@Table[betw[Sum[getGap[a], {n}], ci0], {100000}]

----> 0.94995

      

+2


source


Hint: The sum of independent exponential random variables is a gamma random variable.



+1


source


I would use a Chernoff anchor , from which you can improvise the spacing, because the expression is quite generalizable and you can solve so that the bounded range is wrong <0.05 times.

The Chernoff constraint is the strongest bound you can get on iid variables without knowing too many torque generation functions.

+1


source







All Articles