How does libgd stack up against the competition?

I am curious what kind of experience people had with libgd. I'm looking for an alternative to GDI + (something faster). I've tried ImageMagick but can't get performance out of it. I need.

I have heard that ligd is fast but less feature rich and that ImageMagick is slow but has more features.

I only need very simple image processing routines (scale, crop) in a limited number of formats, mostly jpg. However, I need very good quality interpolation and it should be fast (faster than GDI +).

I am considering trying libgd, does this seem like a good fit given my requirements?

+1


source to share


1 answer


My own experiences with libgd are very good.

I've used it on a website where I grab jpeg images from disk, add a text title to them and discard it back, and it feels about as fast as if the file was served straight from disk.



Considering that every time it decodes a jpeg, changing it and then re-encoding it, that's pretty good!

+2


source







All Articles