Deleting AWS SQS messages using Java sdk

I am researching AWS SQS service. When trying to remove a message from the queue using the java sdk, I got a problem.

A queue is created in SQS and contains three messages. The queue is maintained by AWS S3 for handling large messages.

Here is the method used to receive messages by polling multiple times.

Receive SQS message:

private static void receiveMessage(String queueUrl) {
        // Receive messages
        ReceiveMessageRequest receiveMessageRequest = new ReceiveMessageRequest(queueUrl).withMaxNumberOfMessages(10)
                .withWaitTimeSeconds(10).withVisibilityTimeout(100);
        List<Message> messages = sqsExtended.receiveMessage(receiveMessageRequest).getMessages();
        System.out.println("Number of mesasges : First poll : " + messages.size());
        while (messages.size() > 0) {
            messages = pollForMessages(messages, receiveMessageRequest, queueUrl);
            System.out.println("Messages in next poll : " + messages.size());
        }
        if (messages.size() > 0) {
            System.out.println("displaying last set of messages ");
            for (int i = 0; i < messages.size(); i++) {
                System.out.println("\nMessage received:");
                System.out.println(" ID: " + messages.get(i).getMessageId());
                System.out.println(" Receipt handle: " + messages.get(i).getReceiptHandle());
                System.out.println("approx. num of messages : "
                        + messages.get(i).getAttributes().get("ApproximateNumberOfMessages"));
                System.out.println(" Message body (first sentence): " + messages.get(i).getBody().substring(0, 56));
                // deleteMessage(messages.get(i), queueUrl);
            }
            deleteMessage(messages, queueUrl);
        }
    }

      

Message polling method:

private static List<Message> pollForMessages(List<Message> messages, ReceiveMessageRequest receiveMessageRequest,
            String queueUrl) {
        // display the received messages
        for (int i = 0; i < messages.size(); i++) {
            System.out.println("\nMessage received:");
            System.out.println(" ID: " + messages.get(i).getMessageId());
            System.out.println(" Receipt handle: " + messages.get(i).getReceiptHandle());
            System.out.println(
                    "approx. num of messages : " + messages.get(i).getAttributes().get("ApproximateNumberOfMessages"));
            System.out.println(" Message body (first sentence): " + messages.get(i).getBody().substring(0, 56));
            // deleteMessage(messages.get(i), queueUrl);
        }
        deleteMessage(messages, queueUrl);
        messages = sqsExtended.receiveMessage(receiveMessageRequest).getMessages();
        return messages;
    }

      

Delete SQS message:

private static void deleteMessage(List<Message> messages, String queueUrl) {
        // Delete the messages
        for (Message message : messages) {
            DeleteMessageRequest dmr = new DeleteMessageRequest();
            dmr.withQueueUrl(queueUrl).withReceiptHandle(message.getReceiptHandle());
            sqsExtended.deleteMessage(dmr);
            System.out.println("Deleted the message with Id : " + message.getMessageId());
        }

    }

      

When a method call is made deleteMessage

, the program catches the following exception:

java.lang.AbstractMethodError: com.amazon.sqs.javamessaging.AmazonSQSExtendedClient.deleteMessage(Lcom/

      

Log messages:

Apr 21, 2017 5:32:56 PM com.amazon.sqs.javamessaging.ExtendedClientConfiguration setLargePayloadSupportEnabled
INFO: Large-payload support enabled.
Number of mesasges : First poll : 1

Message received:
 ID: f4f00368-b308-4763-84cf-8e33e1931fed
 Receipt handle: AQEBwhLDOIMobJazre1KoSYoMlHajHD1A6j7gZClk1h4FYWAmFd0p6wIFU69rSuhhVdQef+qF6E6RQIQLWaLqS2r0/Kfw3rUrmppIkTcowsVRW36uJ3p4UqnNjZu0cxncNMw78kHfHRej0gwH0gvvMedZXvEimoXUYZq1+K3Gz35etKsUR9EPKuroYaHZ6Aghdu0Osb4cQu+iLxlBrANhFl63762V7EDEEjSeULyQm52wS/OQq7JiktRWFgyGkp/41tHlN3ARB0v2MM3wXaoZMBt8bAyGURXb+Nx+5e3UoSI5J8pQccSwFnk70N1lV7XUswBTk4549uJ0FPlEMoFef6cxeFi1nxEXkfwIJQ9e93wMJUGLnhsx7rNWhS9w6UCVv4yZoARBsMrQbg287LkACLLnw==
approx. num of messages : null
 Message body (first sentence): {
  "Type" : "Notification",
  "MessageId" : "fc1b19bc-6
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AbstractMethodError: com.amazon.sqs.javamessaging.AmazonSQSExtendedClient.deleteMessage(Lcom/amazonaws/services/sqs/model/DeleteMessageRequest;)Lcom/amazonaws/services/sqs/model/DeleteMessageResult;
    at org.nfjs.aws.sqs.SQSExtendedClient.deleteMessage(SQSExtendedClient.java:149)
    at org.nfjs.aws.sqs.SQSExtendedClient.pollForMessages(SQSExtendedClient.java:139)
    at org.nfjs.aws.sqs.SQSExtendedClient.receiveMessage(SQSExtendedClient.java:108)
    at org.nfjs.aws.sqs.SQSExtendedClient.main(SQSExtendedClient.java:63)

      

I couldn't pinpoint the exact reason for the exception. Am I missing something in the above code snippet using java sdk?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

+3


source to share


2 answers


I'm not using the Amazon SQS Extended Client Library for Java , so I can't judge the details, but it looks like it's out of sync with the Java SDK.

See Exeption on AmazonSQSExtendedClient.deleteMessage for a (so far unresolved) issue on this, and also SQS Extended Client Lib incompatible with Core SDK 1.11.xx for more general information.



The latter points to useful support for aws-sdk-java 1.11.8 pull, although that is already quite outdated as well.

+1


source


SQS messages are successfully cleared when library banks are selected from https://github.com/awslabs/amazon-sqs-java-extended-client-lib

(sources downloaded and compiled).

However, when it is fetched from the maven repository as shown below it comes up as mentioned in the originally posted question.



<dependency>
        <groupId>com.amazonaws</groupId>
        <artifactId>amazon-sqs-java-extended-client-lib</artifactId>
        <version>1.0.0</version>
</dependency>

      

I raised an issue on github ( https://github.com/awslabs/amazon-sqs-java-extended-client-lib/issues/18 ) pointing out the same.

0


source







All Articles