Writing a `define-let` macro, with hygiene

Question

Writing a `define-let` macro, with hygiene

I am trying to write a macro define-let

in racket that "saves" the header (let ((var value) ...) ...)

, namely only a part (var value) ...

, and allows it to be reused later.

The code below works as expected:

#lang racket

;; define-let allows saving the header part of a let, and re-use it later
(define-syntax (define-let stx1)
  (syntax-case stx1 ()
    [(_ name [var value] ...)
     #`(define-syntax (name stx2)
         (syntax-case stx2 ()
           [(_ . body)
            #`(let ([#,(datum->syntax stx2 'var) value] ...)
                . body)]))]))

;; Save the header (let ([x "works]) ...) in the macro foo
(define-let foo [x "works"])
;; Use the header, should have the same semantics as:
;; (let ([x "BAD"])
;;   (let ([x "works])
;;     (displayln x))
(let ([x "BAD"])
  (foo (displayln x))) ;; Displays "works".

The problem is that the macro violates hygiene: as shown in the example below, the variable y

declared in define-let

, which is created by the macro, must be a new, non-terminated symbol due to hygiene, but it manages to leak out of the macro and is mistakenly accessed in (displayln y)

.

;; In the following macro, hygiene should make y unavailable
(define-syntax (hygiene-test stx)
  (syntax-case stx ()
    [(_ name val)
     #'(define-let name [y val])]))

;; Therefore, the y in the above macro shouldn't bind the y in (displayln y).
(hygiene-test bar "wrong")
(let ((y "okay"))
  (bar (displayln y))) ;; But it displays "wrong".

How do I write a macro define-let

so that it behaves like in the first example, but also preserves hygiene when the identifier is generated by the macro, giving "okay"

in the second example?

+3

macros racket hygiene

Georges Dupéron 08 june 15 at 14:02

source to share

1 answer

soegaard · Accepted Answer · 2015-06-08T20:30:17+0000

Following the "Syntax-Parameter" syntax parameter from Chris, here is one solution:

#lang racket
(require racket/stxparam
         (for-syntax syntax/strip-context))

(define-syntax (define-let stx1)
  (syntax-case stx1 ()
    [(_ name [var expr] ...)
     (with-syntax ([(value ...) (generate-temporaries #'(expr ...))])
       #`(begin
           (define-syntax-parameter var (syntax-rules ()))
           ...
           (define value expr)
           ...
           (define-syntax (name stx2)
             (syntax-case stx2 ()
               [(_ . body)
                (with-syntax ([body (replace-context #'stx1 #'body)])
                  #'(syntax-parameterize ([var (syntax-id-rules () [_ value])] ...)
                     . body))]))))]))

(define-let foo [x "works"])

(let ([x "BAD"])
  (foo (displayln x)))       ; => works

(let ([x "BAD"])
  (foo 
   (let ([x "still works"])
     (displayln x))))        ; => still works

UPDATE

This solution conveys additional test in the comments. The new solution transfers the body context to the variables to be bound.

#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/strip-context))

(define-syntax (define-let stx1)
  (syntax-case stx1 ()
    [(_ name [var expr] ...)
     #`(begin
         (define-syntax (name stx2)
           (syntax-case stx2 ()
             [(_ . body)
              (with-syntax ([(var ...) (map (λ (v) (replace-context #'body v))
                                            (syntax->list #'(var ...)))])
                #'(let ([var expr] ...) 
                    . body))])))]))

(define-let foo [x "works"])

(let ([x "BAD"])
  (foo (displayln x)))       ; => works

(let ([x "BAD"])
  (foo 
   (let ([x "still works"])
     (displayln x))))        ; => still works


(let ([z "cool"]) 
  (foo (displayln z)))       ; => cool

Writing a `define-let` macro, with hygiene

More articles: